The Grand Distraction: Russia Hoax vs. Epstein Files

The Setup
- While the nation’s attention is riveted by the explosive Jeffrey Epstein archives—“Who partied with whom?!”—President Trump and his allies (including DNI Tulsi Gabbard) have fired up the deflection engine. Their new spectacle? Blaming Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and the Obama-era intelligence apparatus for stirring up the “Russia hoax.” AP News
- At the same moment AG Pam Bondi rolls out grand jury documents (a hint-dropper, not a full dump) — another cue to shift focus from Epstein’s millions of pages. The Guardian
The Claims
- Gabbard, in her new declassified bombshell, alleges a “treasonous conspiracy” wherein Obama, Clapper, Brennan, Comey, et al., allegedly “manufactured and politicized intelligence” to inflate the Russia meddling narrative. She’s forwarded the dossier to DOJ for possible criminal charges.
- Trump calls it “proof… irrefutable,” though even AP notes the claims are “baseless”—and timed, neatly, to distract from Epstein.
What the Records Actually Show
- Multiple bipartisan reviews—Mueller, the Senate Intelligence Committee, and the ODNI—concluded that Russia did launch an extensive cyber- and disinformation campaign aimed at helping Trump win.
- Their findings also agreed: there was no vote tally hacking—the interference was about social media, hacking then-leaking emails, and amplifying divisive content—not manipulating ballots.
- The Steele dossier was never the sole basis for any intelligence action—it was a lead, not gospel, and many of its key allegations remain unverified or later undermined The Guardian.
The Satire
So, picture the scene:
Act 1:
Trump squirms under the Epstein spotlight—Mar-a-Lago trips, birthday letters, lawsuits… the cameras zoom in. It's getting warm under those gold chandeliers.
Act 2:
Enter Tulsi Gabbard, dramatically raising the Russia-flag: “Treasons-a-plenty! Coup d’état!” Cue ominous music and Fox News exclusive graphics.
Act 3:
Former intelligence chiefs sigh in synchronized exasperation—no vote hacking, just trolls and data leaks. Senate reports gather dust, unread but available.
Act 4:
Meanwhile, back in Epstein-land: “Files? We got files!” Pam Bondi teases the media with sealed transcripts. Trump’s base, unfazed, chants, “Focus on the truth!”—just not that truth.
Meanwhile, the rest of us go, “Wait—facts, please?” 🤔 |
The Zinger
It’s a classic misdirection: “Can you believe what they said about Russia?!” while the Epstein fortress stands, stonewall intact. A little political prestidigitation: show the left hand waving, distract from the crime committed by the right.
TL;DR
- Yes, Russia did engage in significant interference in 2016—social media, hacks, email dumps—per multiple, bipartisan intelligence reviews.
- No, there was no vote-tally tampering—only information warfare. The New Yorker
- Yes, Epstein’s files provide a more serious scandal, but Trump & co. have turbocharged the Russia distraction to steer narrative attention away.
Punchline:
In this political vaudeville, Gabbard’s declassified “coup papers” are the red herring, Epstein the bull in the room—and Trump’s base blinks at the glitter, not the stain.
Related Posts You Might Like
- 👉 The Epstein Bank Records Trump Doesn’t Want You to See
Deep dives into shady offshore trusts, Deutsche Bank red flags, and why the money trail may matter more than the guest list. - 👉 Trump’s Epstein Files Coverup: The Art of the Bury
From missing logs to mystery delays, we break down how Trump’s team is slow-walking the truth—one redaction at a time. - Epstein Didn't Kill Himself!
Member discussion